StarDrive
Generator – home
of the revolutionary Electrodynamic Field Generator –
Unlimited new
potential for our world now exists in
the revolutionary StarDrive
Generator energy technology developed and patented by Archer Enterprises, which may soon be used
for generating electric power on commercial and utility scales more
efficiently and economically than virtually any other means known!
And, alternative energy researchers and all you ZERO-POINT ENERGY enthusiasts may
be gratified to learn that a prototype of this exotic non-nuclear
over-unity electronic dynamo
for producing abundant, clean and inexpensive electric power is now
being assembled, using a number of commonplace late 20th century
technologies.
Electrodynamic Field
Generator:
The official name of the
StarDrive 'Electronic Dynamo', per
the U.S. Patent and PCT (international) Applications, is Electrodynamic Field Generator. The EDF Generator uses banks of permanent magnets and rotating Field Coils to produce a very-high DC rotor
voltage, and plane-parallel ring electrode arrays to electrostatically expand and control
that voltage as applied to the housing, so that huge
quantities of external Field electrons will be self-accelerated to
extreme energy levels. It's somewhat like a glorified arc welder
whose output is deliberately shorted to its own casing, and the DC
voltage and current across the emitter and collector housing
sections can be thermoelectrically elevated to lightning-like
values: but the external Field current
density is limited to a value that falls short of
damaging the casing materials!
StarDrive Generator housing & electrodynamic Field
configuration.
Electrons circulating in the external Field envelope
(depicted in blue above) can reach impact velocities at the two
central collector sections which are very nearly that of light. Vast
quantities of heat may therefore be generated in the StarDrive
device's collectors, and liquid sodium will be pumped through the
Primary Arrays' ceramic resistor networks (below) in
large-scale machines as a coolant. Of course, this "waste" heat may
be used in the commercial generation of electricityanddesalinization of seawater. In
fact, because an intense electric discharge field has the capacity
to absorb endless quantities of quantum
background energy*, the EDF Generator is so efficient that the commercial desalination of
seawater becomes truly cost-effective for the first time! And the
simple DC Primary Power System, like the
early
>>> *The EDF Generator is designed to take maximum
advantage of the electron's inherent ability to absorb nearly any
amount of ambient photonic EM energy and zero-point
energy (random background electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations) as necessary to maintain its eternal steady-state
spin, both in its ceaselessly self-mobile kinetic activity
and in an engineered electrical circuit where untold numbers
of electrons in a continuous vacuum field discharge may be artfully
manipulated into doing vast quantities of recoverable
work.
It would be hard to find a more
cogent and satisfying explanation of this controversial 21st-century
electrodynamic principle [which would validly account for the
source of a StarDrive device's over-unity power
output] than that recently published by Dr. Thomas Bearden – who is one of the only inventors ever to verifiably
demonstrate true over-unity operation of an all-electromagnetic
device [the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator].
His superb 'technical' paper "Source Charge, Van Flandern
Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry", [Dec. 2, 2003]
fully and clearly provides – largely in
layman's terms! – the definitive answers as to why it
must be possible to extract useful energy from the vacuum and its associated zero-point
energy.
You
confuse COP with efficiency, and they are two quite different
things. Even many of the textbooks confuse these terms quite
often.
Rigorously, the
efficiency of a motor or system may be defined as (total useful
output) divided by (total energy input from all sources).
No inert system can have an efficiency of greater than 100%,
for that would be a violation of energy
conservation.
The
coefficient of performance (COP) of a motor or system may be defined
as (total useful output) divided by (energy input by the operator
only). If the operator only has to input, say, 10 joules of
energy and the active environment freely inputs 90 joules of energy,
then the total input is 100 joules. Now suppose that the
system has 50% efficiency; i.e., it wastes or "loses" half the
energy before it dissipates the rest of it in the load to do useful
work. In that case the system outputs 50 joules of work for a
total input of 100 joules, but with the operator only inputting 10
of those 100 input joules.
So this
system has an efficiency of 50% but a COP
=5.0.
A
windmill, e.g., may have an efficiency of 30% or less, but its COP
approaches infinity because the operator does not have to input any
energy at all. He just pays for the siting, building of the
windmill, repairs, and maintenance. And hopes his winds hold
good.
The
common home heatpump is usually not even 50% efficient, but in
appropriate conditions it has a maximum COP = 8.22, and any good
heatpump will actually produce about COP =
4.0.
In a
sailboat, you have to input some energy to move the rudder and steer
it, but not nearly so much energy as is used to propel the boat
through the water. The wind caught by the sail inputs the rest
of it. Yet the sail is a fairly sloppy process also, and
unless well-designed will not be nearly as efficient as a
well-designed one.
So the
trick is to get the active environment to give you a "free wind" so
you can have something approaching a windmill. Or as close to
that as you can get.
Fortunately, in
electrodynamics there are many "free winds" one can make with
ease. The simplest one is to just make a common dipole.
Lee and Yang received a Nobel Prize in 1957 for their work in broken
symmetry and the weak interaction. One of the broken
symmetries that was proven was that of opposite charges -- such as
are on the ends of a dipole.
The
very words "broken symmetry" in power systems implies that something
virtual has become observable. In other words, the charges of
the dipole continually absorb virtual photons from the seething
vacuum (that is proven and well-known, and one does not have to
prove it again). The spin of the charges then coherently
integrates that absorbed virtual energy into real, observable EM
energy. The dipole thus pours out EM energy in all directions
at the speed of light. Let it alone and don't destroy it, and
it will pour out that energy indefinitely. The dipoles in the
original matter in the universe have been doing that for some 14
billion years or so. We used that fact of broken symmetry of
opposite charges, together with the known clustering of virtual
charges of opposite sign around any "isolated" observable charge, to
treat the observable charge as a set of composite dipoles.
Hence this finally explained the long-vexing source charge problem:
how does a charge just sit there an pour out energy in all
directions at the speed of light, establishing its associated fields
and potentials and all that energy in them? We explained that
in 2000, after a couple or three years work on
it.
A
simple "free energy system" can be built for a dollar. Just
place a charged capacitor (or electret) across a permanent magnet so
that the E-field is perpendicular to the H-field of the
magnet. That silly thing will sit there and pour out Poynting
energy flow S = E x H, so long as you just let it alone. Wait
one year, and it will have changed the energy density of a volume of
space a light year in radius (reaching out beyond the solar
system).
In
solving the dipole and source charge problems, it was found that the
energy input comes from the time domain into 3-space via the
negative charge, and exits 3-space back to the time domain via the
positive charge.
In
electrical engineering, it is recognized that the source charge
pours out the energy to create all its associated fields, but until
2000 there has been no explanation as to what furnished the input
energy. In effect, electrical engineering and classical
electrodynamicists for more than a century have assumed that every
charge in the universe is a perpetual motion machine of the worst
kind, creating energy out of
nothing.
There
is no problem at all in extracting all the energy one wishes from
the active vacuum, anywhere in the universe, at any time. Just
make a dipole.
The
problem is in (1) catching some of that freely gushing EM energy in
a circuit containing a load, and (2) dissipating the caught and
collected EM energy in that load to power it, without using half the
caught energy to destroy the source
dipole(s).
That is
the ONLY real energy problem on the planet, and always has
been.
It is
ironic that the National Academy of Science, the National Science
Foundation, the great national test labs, the universities, and the
private research institutes are not working on the sole energy
problem at all.
Hope
this helps.
Tom
Bearden
Subject: Simple 1.25
efficiency test ... Please help me out ... Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002
23:28:18 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build
10.0.2616 Importance: Normal
Hi, first let me thank you
for all your great research and time you devoted for our society
&
With great respect I would like to clarify simple
shadow that is left upon a discussion I had with somebody about your
research & Id really like to be able to explain all of this
myself to my partner but I can t & perhaps if you could help me
I would really appreciate.
In this article you describe a
1.25 over unity system & everything was fine until my partner
pointed at me that such electrical circuit is merely impossible to
find (I mean by this that it as 100% efficiency &) and that most
of scientist or engineer would always take those lost of energy in
their calculation of efficiency & therefore leaving this kind of
theorical experiments impossible to be.
If I did well
understand him, no circuit is totally 100% free of lost of energy
& so that it would be impossible to get 100% of power at the
shaft. And as following, the total power calculated would (in a
perfect world approach 100% of used power or inputed).
I
think you are right about this but I have no good explanation about
this & so once again id really appreciate you help me out here
&
The energy density of the vacuum potential is enormous, even
mind-boggling. While scientists have estimated that energy by
various means, a reasonable calculation is given by Wheeler and
Misner in their Geometrodynamics. In that calculation,
Wheeler and Misner apply the formalism of general relativity to the
zero point energy of vacuum. The fabric of space appears as a
turbulent virtual plasma consisting of particles whose size is on
the order of Planck's length—some 10 -33 cm. The energy
density of the electric flux passing through each particle is
enormous: It is 1093 grams per cubic centimeter,
expressed in mass units (i.e., the energy per cubic centimeter has
been divided by c2).
And that's just using the spatial energy density (the
“decompressed” or ordinary energy). The
energy density of the vacuum is appreciably greater than what
physicists normally calculate, because they do not calculate the
additional time-energy density portion of the vacuum
stress. If we also allow for the time-energy (the “compressed” energy), we restore that
c2 division factor, producing on the order of
10110 grams per cubic centimeter, or—in energy terms—on the order of 10127
joules per cubic centimeter.
J. A. Wheeler and C. Misner, Geometrodynamics, Academic
Press, New York, 1962.
Tom Bearden comments:
There are many ways to extract
energy from the seething vacuum. Unfortunately, at present our
scientific community takes a bizarre stance. In particle
physics it is well known that the active vacuum is incredibly
energetic. Calculations by leading physicists such as Wheeler show
that a cubic centimeter of vacuum (about the tip of one's little
finger in volume) has so much raw energy in it that, if condensed
into matter, there would be more matter than is observable in the
universe through the largest telescope! So even a tiny efficiency of
tapping could and will extract all the energy anyone could
wish.
However, in classical Maxwell
Heaviside electrodynamics (as used in electrical engineering), the
same scientific community now assumes in the model that the vacuum
is absolutely inert!
The model also assumes that the
local spacetime is flat, so no energy from curved spacetime can be
forthcoming, according to that inane model. Then the model assumes
that all EM fields, potentials, and every joule of EM energy in the
universe is produced by their associated source charges—right out of nothing at all, with no
energy input to the charge at all, but with continuous energy flow
from it.
----------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps the greatest advantage the EDF Generator may have over
almost any other over-unity device
now known or proposed is that it is fundamentally
linearly-scalable – including the liquid sodium coolant
system. Not only can large "Thermal Unit" devices be designed
to produce electrical power at 60
to 720 MW output levels, but they will be able to do so for many years before the permanent magnet
banks must be remagnetized! And the only
truly external input energy required in the meantime is that necessary to
initially bring the rotor up to speed . . .**
[ On June 11, 2002, U.S.
Patent6,404,089 for the
Electrodynamic Field Generator was issued to
Mark Tomion, president of Archer Enterprises. To the best of our
knowledge, this Patent is the first in the world for a truly all-electric power plant, and you
may click here to link to it. Regrettably, most of the equations provided at
the close of the Description section, which define the
classic 'flying saucer' housing configuration that is so important
to the device's proper operation, are virtually unrecognizable in
the online American version.
Fortunately, the Europeans distilled a
pdf copy for the EDF Generator's PCT (International) Patent
Application that is photostatically identical to the
original, and the math and drawings came through beautifully. The
Detailed Calculations are shown on pages 70–78, and the Table
of Dimensions that describes the housing's shape in purely algebraic terms is on pgs. 70–71. Therefore, if you would like to review the PCT Application, click here.
From this perspective, it can be seen
that the 24kW air-cooled StarDrive (EDF)
Generator we are currently prototyping – which is only 30" in
diameter, and will weigh less than 50 lbs. – should exhibit an
extraordinary over-unityCoefficient of Performance for the following
reasons:
(1) in a StarDrive
Generator or Dynamo, DC current is induced to
flow in the Field output circuit by means of static electric fields
which impress a voltage directly across the conductive rotor
segments, rather than by alternating magnetic fields that are linked
to a ferromagnetic armature and/or stator. And, given the resultant
capacitive brushless isolation of the output rotor current from the
induction ring input circuit, the magnitude of
the device's DC output current is limited only
by rotor ampacity and the thermionic emission rate of
its Primary Array cathodes – and is therefore
electrochemically- and temperature-dependent only (not mechanically
and/or magnetically dependent);
(2) a load-proportional magnetic
back-torque on the ceramic rotor is not
continuously produced but only while the output current is
increasing, and otherwise the full-load input
torque required is not significantly greater than that under
open-circuit (no-load) operation! So, the equilibrium input
torque at any given output level is merely that required to overcome
simple frictional losses;
(3) by carrying the
entire output current on only a small number of radialinear rotor
segments, even the tiny remaining inductive magnetic losses just
described are minimized, in that the self-inductance of a
straight conductor is lower than that of a closed-loop by a factor
of π (pi). While only 32 such segments are used in our
prototype 24kW StarDrive Generator, the
self-inductance in any typical generator or electromagnetic coil is
the product of hundreds or thousands of turns (or closed loops) of
wire – leading to Lenz losses which are correspondingly higher than
those that will be evident in any EDF Generator; and
(4) most importantly, once a 24 kW no-load Field current has been established at a
desired inverter input voltage, electrical input to the warm-up
heaters may be wholly discontinued due to adequate internal
voltage-drop heating of the power resistors and their attached thermionic primary cathodes – and then the only significant input power required is
that drawn by the small DC rotor drive
motor.
For these reasons we are confident that
our prototype 24kW air-cooled StarDrive
Generator will demonstrate during certified testing a minimum
no-load COP of 20 [i.e., a net
output-to-input ratio of 20:1], and a minimum full-load COP of between 4 and 7. Such
a successful demonstration will quickly open up incredible
opportunities for both private and commercial entities in
applications which could never be cost-effectively (or profitably)
developed to date. One of the first applications we intend to pursue
with the 24kW StarDrive Generator is the commercial electrolytic production of hydrogen
for use in fuel cells, and for a very interesting and
informative look at this timely issue you may wish to take a look at
our Electrolysis Page. For an excellent
overview regarding the planned use of liquid-cooled StarDrive
Dynamo units in the commercial
desalination or distillation of water, just click on the red
Utility Plant Specs link at the bottom of
this page.
> Basic EDF (StarDrive)
Generator design and operation issues are discussed in further
detail in our 1st
Proof-of-Concept Experiment Report. At the
present time, we are building a second and definitive P-o-C
experimental setup utilizing all-production-spec materials and
components. A similar Report on the testing of this actual
EDF Generator primary power system will
be forthcoming, as will further news {!} about the funding of our
full-scale 24kW Prototype Project.
>>Qualified U.S.
organizations that would like permission to assemble a prototype EDF
Generator or further technical data about the technology are
welcome to contact our business office using the e-mail link below,
or by phone during normal business hours [9 am to 5 pm (EST),
Mon.– Fri.].
>>> Engineers and
students may be assured that our technical manual StarDrive Engineering(~440 pgs.) provides a full basic set of linearly-scalable
specifications for the primary
systems of over-unity EDF Generators and Dynamos up to 35 ft. in
diameter, as well as sufficient mathematical treatment to fully
substantiate both the novel conceptual claims and hardware proposals
made. You are welcome to purchase a copy using the link provided
below!
– –
Energy Notes – –
> Whether or not you (our good visitors) acknowledge
humanity's dire need to develop an advanced new
electric power generation technology which obviates any
continued dependence on nonrenewable hydrocarbons, and soon,
you should take a few moments to review and contemplate the recent
findings of a group of Swedish scientists regarding their revised
downward estimate of remaining global oil and natural gas
reserves. While the U.S. government would encourage us to believe
that global oil reserves are adequate for another 25 years at the
present rate of consumption, and that sufficient natural gas remains
for over 65 years, the Swedish team's analysis suggests these
figures may more realistically be something like only 18 years
and 45 years respectively. Please see this NewScientist.com
article (dated 10/05/03).
And
from another source: Most experts agree that there is between
990 billion and 1.1 trillion barrels of accessible crude petroleum
oil left on the planet; the BP World Energy Review 2002 puts the
number at 1.05 trillion barrels. At the present rate of consumption,
24 billion barrels per year, the world will run out of oil by 2043.
However, if the demand for crude oil continues to increase at the
same rate it has in the past, the world's oil supply may be depleted
as soon as 2020. [ref.: www.biotour.org/fossilfuels.html]
One might also stop to
consider the following: according to a great recent article in
the New York Times ["As Earth Warms, the Hottest Issue is
Energy", by Kenneth Chang; dated 11/04/03], the world's total energy
use is currently about 12 trillion joules per second – the
equivalent of lighting around 120 billion 100-watt bulbs – and 85
percent of that comes from fossil fuels. About 64% of the world's
electricity is generated with fossil fuels.
Hiçbir yazı/ resim izinsiz olarak
kullanılamaz!! Telif hakları uyarınca bu bir suçtur..! Tüm
hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak
gösterilmek şartıyla siteden alıntı yapılabilir.
